Interesting Facts About Underwear

Antipukatelnoe underwear. Farting is both funny and embarrassing fact of life. Recently, scientists have come to the aid of all farts stink and solved the problem. The British company has Shred dies year produces underwear for men and women, which is designed to filter even the most horrible smells. This is achieved by using revolutionary fabric called Zorflex with activated charcoal.

First, it is sold as medical underwear for people with digestive diseases such as Crohn's disease and irritable bowel syndrome, but the product quickly gained popularity with the public often farting. Zorflex has extensive medical and industrial applications and is used for wound dressing and the creation of protective clothing. British Army launches antibacterial underwear for soldiers from the same Zorflexa, and it can be worn for a few months. Standard cotton for a time just crumbles to shreds and starts to stink terribly.

Color blindness and bright underwear. Although color blindness is quite common phenomenon, this disease was discovered only in the late 1790s the English chemist John Dalton. Dalton was born into a Quaker family. Conservative Quakers were known for their love of dark clothes without any decorations and jewelry. So when John bought his mother a pair of red stockings on her birthday, a scandal erupted. Dalton thought they were blue, as did his brother, indicating that their problem was caused by genetic variation.

Dalton was fine scholar, but his theory of color blindness was incorrect. He believed that the liquid in his eyes was just blue. Dalton was so devoted to science that has ordered from the lab assistant to pump liquid from his eyes after death to ensure that it really is blue.

Dog's underwear. What not to do for science. In the early 1990s, the Cairo University doing research that how different fabric underwear can affect from sperm production. As test researchers used dogs. There were three groups: a control group that was not wearing underwear, a group who wore cotton underwear, and a group of polyester underwear. Lingerie was free, so airtight polyester was not the deciding factor. 

The experiment lasted three years. During the first 24 months, until the dog wearing underwear, their sperm are constantly tested. The control group and in the cotton underwear showed little change of health, while the polyester group showed a decrease in the number of sperm and the deterioration of its quality and degenerative changes in general. The experiment continued for another 12 months without any undergarment. Most dogs of the group in polyester gradually returned to normal, but two dogs continued to show poor results. Exactly how Polyester adversely affects dogs is unknown. There is a theory that produces polyester dangerous electricity, so to save future offspring men should carefully approach the choice of underwear.